5 Finding Aids.
Sort by:
Page: 1
Terms
Shenandoah Valley Campaign, 1864 (May-August)—Personal narratives in subject [X]
Search
Limit by Facet
Subject
Bull Run, 1st Battle of (Virginia : 1861) (1)
Cedar Creek, Battle of, Va., 1864 (1)
Confederate States of America -- Army -- Virginia Infantry Regiment, 4th (1)
Confederate States of America -- Army -- Virginia Infantry Regiment, 5th (1)
Confederate States of America. -- Army. -- Rockbridge Rifles (1)
Confederate States of America. -- Army. -- Virginia Infantry Regiment, 27th (1)
Confederate States of America. Army—Virginia Artillery—Shoemaker's Battery (1)
Hunter's Raid—Virginia—Lexington (3)
Lexington (Va.) -- Freemasons, Mountain City Lodge No.67 (1)
Lexington (Va.)—History—Civil War, 1861-1865 (4)
Lynchburg (Va.)—History—Civil War, 1861-1865 (1)
Lynchburg, Battle of, Lynchburg, Va., 1864 (1)
Shenandoah Valley Campaign, 1864 (August-November)—Personal narratives (1)
Shenandoah Valley Campaign, 1864 (May-August)—Personal narratives[X]
Soldiers -- Confederate States of America -- Correspondence (1)
Soldiers -- Connecticut -- Diaries (1)
Soldiers—Virginia—Correspondence (1)
Soldiers—Virginia—Diaries (1)
United States. Army—Connecticut Infantry Regiment, 18th (1862-1865) (1)
United States. Army—West Virginia Cavalry Regiment, 3rd (1861-1865) (1)
United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865 (1)
United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Personal narratives (1)
United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Personal narratives—Union (2)
Virginia Military Institute—Cadet life—1860-1869 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Civil War, 1861-1865 (4)
Virginia Military Institute—Class of 1867 (1)
Virginia—History—Civil War, 1861-1865 (2)
Virginia—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Personal narratives—Confederate (1)
Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids. Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity. Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids

Page: 1