3 Finding Aids.
Sort by:
Page: 1
Terms
'United States History Civil War 1861 1865 Destruction and pillage' in subject
Search
Limit by Facet
Subject
African Americans--Virginia--Williamsburg (1)
Antietam, Battle of, Md., 1862. (1)
Bull Run, 2nd Battle of, Va., 1862. (1)
Chancellorsville (Va.), Battle of, 1863. (1)
College of William and Mary--History--20th century (1)
College of William and Mary--History--Civil War, 1861-1865 (1)
College of William and Mary--Students (1)
College theater--United States (1)
Community theater (1)
Education--Virginia--Williamsburg--19th century (1)
Fort Monroe (Va.)--History--Civil War, 1861-1865 (1)
Fredericksburg (Va.), Battle of, 1862. (1)
Gardening--Virginia (1)
Horticultural literature (1)
Jamestown Exposition (1907) (1)
Jamestown Festival (1957) (1)
Jamestown Ter-centennial Exposition (1907) (1)
Legal documents (1)
Lynchburg (Va.)--History (1)
Malvern Hill (Va.), Battle of, 1862. (1)
Peninsular Campaign, 1862. (1)
Postcards--Virginia (1)
Seven Days', 1862. (1)
South Mountain, Battle of, 1862. (1)
United States--History--Civil War, 1861- 1865--Personal narratives. (1)
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Campaigns. (1)
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Destruction and pillage. (1)
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Equipment and supplies. (1)
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Hospitals. (1)
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Regimental histories. (1)
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865 (2)
United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Destruction and pillage (2)
United States--History--Revolution, 1775-1783 (1)
United States. Navy (1)
White Oak Swamp (Va.), Battle of, 1862. (1)
Williamsburg, Battle of, Williamsburg, Va., 1862 (1)
Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids. Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity. Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids

Page: 1