7 Finding Aids.
Sort by:
Page: 1
Terms
'Chickamauga Battle of Ga 1863' in subject Virginia Heritage in publisher [X]
Chickamauga, Battle of, Ga., 1863 in subject [X]
Search
Limit by Facet
Subject
Chickamauga, Battle of, Ga., 1863[X]
Civil War (3)
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 (3)
Antietam, Battle of, Md., 1862 (1)
Atlanta Campaign, 1864 (1)
Bull Run, 2nd Battle of, Va., 1862 (1)
Cedar Creek, Battle of, Va., 1864 (1)
Chancellorsville (Va.), Battle of, 1863 (1)
Chattanooga, Battle of, Chattanooga, Tenn., 1863 (1)
Civil War - Ohio 18th Volunteer Infantry, Company B. (1)
Civil War - Ohio 18th Volunteer Infantry. (1)
Civil War - Ohio 36th Volunteer Infantry, Company G. (1)
Civil War - Ohio 36th Volunteer Infantry. (1)
Civil War - West Virginia 12th Infantry. (1)
Civil War - West Virginia 1st Infantry. (1)
Civil War - West Virginia. (1)
Civil War - raids and raiders. (1)
Civil War -- War diaries (1)
Civil War -- letters (1)
Civil War -- Illinois 85th Infantry (1)
Civil War -- Kanawha County, (W. Va.) (1)
Civil War battles - Murfreesboro. (1)
Civil War battles - Vicksburg. (1)
Civil War battles. (1)
Civil War raids - Jones & Imboden. (1)
Courtship--1860-1870 (1)
Election of 1864. (1)
Emancipation Proclamation. (1)
Fredericksburg (Va.), Battle of, 1862 (1)
Gettysburg, Battle of, Gettysburg, Pa., 1863 (1)
Indigestion (1)
Kanawha County - Civil War. (1)
Local/Regional History and Appalachian South (1)
Missionary Ridge, Battle of, Tenn., 1863 (1)
Politics and government. (1)
Railroads (1)
Rivers and river valleys. (1)
Secession (1)
Slaves and slavery. (1)
Statehood politics -- West Virginia (1)
Veterans. SEE ALSO under Civil War - veterans. (1)
West Virginia - Civil War. (1)
Women's history -- 1850-1899 (1)
Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids. Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity. Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids

Repository:
Special Collections and University Archives, Virginia Tech
Published:
unknown    
Repository:
Special Collections and University Archives, Virginia Tech
Published:
2012    
Page: 1